Appellants-Defendants, City of Terre Haute, Engineer’s Office of the City of Terre Haute, and City of Terre Haute Street Commissioners (collectively, the City), appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in Appellee-Plaintiff’s, Annette Pairsh (Pairsh), personal injury action. The City raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the City is immune from liability for Pairsh’s injuries pursuant to the Indiana Tort Claims Act.
Conclusion (slip op. at 9): We conclude that the trial court erred in denying the City’s motion for summary judgment. Therefore, we remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of the City. Reversed and remanded.
Key Analysis (slip op. at 5, 8): Our supreme court has adopted the “planning-operational test” for determining whether a function is discretionary for purposes of the ITCA. The planning-operational standard “dictates that a governmental entity will not be held liable for negligence arising from decisions which are made at a planning level, as opposed to an operational level . . . Decker’s affidavit reflects the exercise of official judgment and discretion, the weighing of alternatives, an assessment of competing priorities, the weighing of budgetary considerations, and the allocation of scarce resources, all of which are “planning activities” under the “planning-operational test.”
MAY, J., dissents with opinion: “The evidence the City designated does not establish as a matter of law that its decision not to repair the sidewalk where Pairsh fell was performance of a discretionary function that entitles the City to tort immunity . . . “
DisclaimerADVERTISING MATERIAL www.boselaw.com/disclaimer
- Amish Litigants Forced to Honor Agreement
- Indiana Appellate Civil Case Law Summary (May 2012)
- U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down FCC’s Indecency Determinations Against Fox And ABC
- Indiana Appellate Civil Case Law Summary (February 2012)
- Extraordinary Stay Against Newspaper Publication Should Raise Concern
- absolute privilege Advertising Injury Alternative Fee amish anonymous speech Antitrust Appeals Boehm Censorship CERCLA Class Actions Commercial Lines Policy Communications Law Defamation Discovery discovery tools Duty to Defend environmental cleanup FCC First Amendment Free Speech Indecency Indiana indiana court of appeals Indiana Supreme Court Internet Law Journalist's Privilege Justice Life Insurance Media Law Newsgathering objections public utility religious Res Judicata Sevnth Circuit sewer district Shepard Technology United States Supreme Court