To access case, press here
Appellant Russelburg filed a complaint against Arnaez and Clouse alleging legal malpractice. Arnaez and Clouse filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that Russelburg did not pay his own attorney’s fees and, therefore, that he did not have standing to sue. The trial court granted the summary judgment motion in favor of Arnaez and Clouse. On appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, we held that summary judgment was inappropriate because Russelburg had standing to sue. On remand, following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Arnaez and Clouse. This appeal ensued.
Conclusion (slip op. at 5): Russelburg’s contentions [that the evidence is sufficient to prove his claim] amount to a request that we reweigh the evidence, which we will not do. The trial court, as the trier of fact, was entitled to find Russelburg’s evidence not credible. The trial court did not err when it entered judgment in favor of Arnaez and Clouse. Affirmed.
Key Analysis (slip op. at 4): Indeed, the particulars of appellate practice are not within the common knowledge of a large segment of the legal community. Accordingly, to the extent that the trial court concluded that Russelburg was required to present expert testimony, there was no error.
DisclaimerADVERTISING MATERIAL www.boselaw.com/disclaimer
- Amish Litigants Forced to Honor Agreement
- Indiana Appellate Civil Case Law Summary (May 2012)
- U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down FCC’s Indecency Determinations Against Fox And ABC
- Indiana Appellate Civil Case Law Summary (February 2012)
- Extraordinary Stay Against Newspaper Publication Should Raise Concern
- absolute privilege Advertising Injury Alternative Fee amish anonymous speech Antitrust Appeals Boehm Censorship CERCLA Class Actions Commercial Lines Policy Communications Law Defamation Discovery discovery tools Duty to Defend environmental cleanup FCC First Amendment Free Speech Indecency Indiana indiana court of appeals Indiana Supreme Court Internet Law Journalist's Privilege Justice Life Insurance Media Law Newsgathering objections public utility religious Res Judicata Sevnth Circuit sewer district Shepard Technology United States Supreme Court